05 Sept 2012
The available crystal structures of the TSHR in complex with M22 and K–70 provide valuable insight into how a stimulating and a blocking antibody bind to the TSHR and, together with extensive experimental studies, suggest that these arrangements reflect binding of TSHR antibodies in general. In the absence of further crystal structures of the TSHR in complex with other antibodies, they used charge–charge interaction mapping methodology to predict binding of a new thyroid-stimulating human MAb K1–18 and a thyroid-blocking mouse MAb RSR-B2 with the TSHR. The predicted binding arrangements were validated by the effects of the TSHR amino acid mutations on the biological activity of the MAbs, and the binding arrangements of the TSHR LRD with two stimulating (M22 and K1–18) and two blocking MAbs (K1–70 and RSR-B2) were compared. Núñez Miguel et al. (2012) Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 49 137-151.
Read the full article at: DOI: 10.1530/JME-12-0040
Call for nominations for Awards Committee Chair
30 Oct 2024
James M Tanner Award - 2025 nominations open
30 Oct 2024
Would you like to host the BSPED annual meeting?
21 Oct 2024